amoralegria

El Palacio Real de Madrid

Posted by: amoralegria on: May 28, 2012

3 julio 2010

El Palacio Real de Madrid fue construido después que un incendio destruyó el primero castillo en 1734. Fue completado en 1760 para el Rey Carlos III. El rey era italiano y les invitó a muchos artistas italianos para contribuir a la construcción y decoración del palacio. Los arquitectos eran Jubara, Sacchetti y Sabatini, y los techos fueron pintados por artistas italianos también. El aspecto general del palacio es de mucho lujo, muy opulento.

Algunos de los frescos en el Salón de los Tronos fueron pintados debajo del techo, en la parte superior de las paredes, sus colores traslapándose con los bordados de oro, dando la impresión que fueron revelados por debajo de la pintura en las paredes. Los mármoles que fueron usados en los portales y en las paredes vinieron de varios lugares de España; cada salón tiene mármol diferente.

Muchos de los salones oficiales son decorados de manera lujosa excesiva. El Salen de Columnas contiene tapices pesados hechos de lana, seda, plata y oro, que eran no solamente para la decoración sino también para calificar a los salones. El diseñador de los apartamentos del rey era Gasparini. Las paredes de cada salón están cubiertas de seda; el primer salón de Gasparini (la Saleta de Carlos III), en el cual las sedas rojas y doradas que cubren a las paredes son iguales a las sedas que cubren a los sofás y que fueron usados para las cortinas. Hay pinturas de alegorías históricas. En el Salón Azul, las sedas en las paredes son azules y doradas y hay retratos de los reyes y reinas pintados por Goya. El tercer salón de Gasparini es tal vez el más lujoso: el techo es decorado en estuco de flores, hojas, frutas y pájaros y en cada esquina hay una pareja china. El piso de este salón combina todos los mármoles españoles. Las paredes se cubren con seda tejida con hilos de oro y hay una araña de luces enorme que se parece una fuente. ¡También en este salón hay bustos escultados hace 2000 anos de los mitos de Cesar Augusto, que fueron excavados en España!

Los últimos reales a vivir en el Palacio Real eran los abuelos del rey actual, Juan Carlos. La familia de Juan Carlos prefiere alojamiento menos lujoso y hoy en día el palacio es propiedad pública.

SPAIN BLOG – INTRO.

Posted by: amoralegria on: May 28, 2012

I love to travel and have had many experiences that I have recounted in personal and email journals. In July 2010, my husband and I went with a group of students on a Study Abroad Program in Spain. I wrote many journal entries and essays, and now have decided to post them here.

The journal entries are in English for the most part; the essays are primarily in Spanish because those of us who were advanced students were required to write in Spanish about the places that we were required to visit. Since I already spent a good deal of time writing them and looking up words in my English-Spanish dictionary, I have no desire to translate them back to English!

Another thing I need to mention is that four of my email journals were lost when my computer was hacked into shortly after we returned. I asked people that I had sent them to, to please forward to me whichever of the journals they had kept, so I managed to retrieve all but four of them. Instead, for the missing pieces, I will post some of my pictures and write briefly about them.

Two years have passed since this trip and my memory is somewhat faulty. However, I have long had the goal to make a major part of my blog into an account of my travels; so finally I am getting started!

Photo Challenge-Summer

Posted by: amoralegria on: May 26, 2012

It is too hard to pick just one photo! However, there is one constant theme of my summer every year: a relaxing week or two at the cottage, our summer home in northern Wisconsin. These pictures were all taken in the area last summer.

I love rain and thunderstorms at the cottage. I wanted to capture the patterns of circles made by the raindrops. I added a little more contrast to bring it out more.

What would summer be without a long bike ride to enjoy nature? We are cycling on the longest trestle on the Bearskin Trail – southern end (going north)

I liked the colorful chairs that were visible over the lake through the trees.

Weekly Photo Challenge: Contrast: Transition

Posted by: amoralegria on: March 10, 2012

Contrast: Transition

I selected this photo for the Weekly Photo Challenge: Contrast because the silhouette of the elderly woman seated in a lonely chair against stark white emptiness of the background captures a poignant moment of transition for her. For me it represents how elderly people must face the increasing loss of their independence as they age.

My mother was being moved from the retirement home apartment she had lived in independently to the Assisted Living section. Little remained in her apartment when this photo was taken, and I found the image a striking insight of what she must have been feeling in that moment. Mother must have felt a bit lonely, and scared, knowing she could no longer live independently and unsure of what to make of this move. What did it mean for the end of her life? How much would she be able to do on her own in Assisted Living? Would she still have contact with her friends? These were questions she might have been contemplating.

Prompt: If you started your own nation, what rules would be in your constitution? What country would you model your rules after?

My Constitution would be mostly the same as the United States, with a few changes, deletions and additions:

1. Get rid of the Electoral College. It’s obsolete. The people need to have the
right to a direct vote for their leaders.

2. There should be a Labor Code that guarantees paid time off, paid maternity
leave and a set number of hours to work per week (above that would be
overtime). – This is not radical – we are the only 1st world country that
doesn’t have at least two of these things.

3. Single payer health care for all.

4. Clarification of the 2nd amendment, that it doesn’t mean everyone has the
right to own a gun, only the military and police, rifles for hunters. Anyone
else would have to go through a rigorous and national background check.

5. Public financing of elections and/or a limit to how much a candidate can
collect and spend on her/his campaign.

6. Guaranteed free and equal public education for all at least through high
school.

7. An energy policy that would require research and development of “clean”
sources of energy, and penalties for polluters.

Sound like it would cost too much money to do all these things? There would
also be a provision that would outline a fair tax policy:

8. People making more than a million dollars would pay a higher percentage of
their income with no loopholes. (I’d like to say billionaires should pay more
but I don’t even think any one person should earn that amount – it’s obscene).
Large corporations that have a profit margin of a certain amount (not percent)
would pay more in taxes. However, if the corporation used the revenue to
reinvest in their business which would benefit the company, its employees and
the economy as a whole, they would not pay as much.

9. There would be a very hefty penalty for a company to relocate overseas. This
penalty would be distributed to the displaced workers in the U.S.

10. People making below a certain amount (which would change over time – $100k
doesn’t mean today what it did, say, 30 years ago) would pay less in taxes.

11. Amending the Constitution would require what it currently requires.

Post-a-Day: What does freedom mean?

Posted by: amoralegria on: July 3, 2011

What does freedom mean? People talk about freedom all the time,
but what does it mean in real life? Is a person who has a job truly free? What about the responsibilities of having a family or a friend? It’s one thing to be free to make a choice, but after a choice is made, are we truly free anymore?

“Freedom” is a very broad term, and one that people throw around all the time without really understanding it. Politicians use it to defend wars: “We’re fighting for our freedom” when actually most modern wars primarily affect people in the
country in which the war is being waged. I would even say that, used this way,
it CURTAILS our freedom because by spending billions of dollars on a war whose
only “freedom” for us is an unlimited source of oil, for example, that money could
have been used to enhance our freedom at home: freedom to get a good education,
freedom to choose a job based on interest rather than the need for health insurance
benefits, etc.

On the other hand, freedom in a national sense is the way we tend to view the
world: there are countries with freedom and countries without freedom. But who
determines which is which? If we leave it up to political pundits, we might
never understand what freedom means ourselves. (Of course, people have the
freedom to believe the pundits if they wish).

I do think that some countries have more freedom than others. In some countries, if you write a letter to someone, the government may read and censor what you
wrote. If you criticize the local government for not fixing potholes in the
street, you could get in trouble – even if not, the atmosphere is such that
people are afraid to speak their minds on even such minor subjects. In some
countries, you are not allowed to practice the religion of your choice, or go
wherever you want to go. In Saudi Arabia, women are not allowed to drive!

In dictatorships, a lot of people live in fear, which curtails their freedom. They
may be free to have whatever they want to eat, or free to give birth, etc. -
personal things, but not having what we call “First Amendment Rights”
I would say that means those people are not really free.

Freedom, however, doesn’t mean that you can do whatever you want to do all the time. Like the second part of the prompt question asked, after you make a choice (and are bound by it), are you still free? I would say yes, because freedom to me
means to have the ability to choose your path in life. Life is a series of
choices and decisions, both good and bad, so even if you have made a choice
that limits you in some way,  you still are free because it was YOUR choice. There may be consequences, but these also may involve decisions you have the freedom to make.

However, without freedom, your choices are limited or restricted by external forces – an oppressive government, the lack of money, people who carry concealed guns wherever they go, laws which may not allow a woman to travel freely or go out in public unveiled, etc. Are Americans more free than Arabs? Are rich people more free than poor people? If so, it should not be so.

I believe that freedom is always limited to staying within the law or following
the rules (because if you don’t, you might go to jail!). We are free to break
the rules, but then we must suffer the consequences of doing that. Most people
choose to live within a set of rules because it is what holds us together as a
society and because we are all interdependent: what I do affects you, what you
do affects another person, what another person does affects me, etc. We do not
have the freedom to deny freedom to someone else, if that person has not
infringed on our freedom or anyone else’s.

So, for example, I have the freedom to live the lifestyle I choose, AS LONG AS it
doesn’t hurt anyone else. If persons who are gay wish to get married, they
should have the freedom to do so. This doesn’t affect anyone else’s marriage.
It might violate their moral code – which they have the freedom to have – but they
can apply this moral code to their own lives and leave gay couples alone.
Freedom means being able to seek a partner, and to find love. Forcing someone
to hide their love or to act like they are something they are not, curtails
that person’s freedom.

There are many other personal/moral issues that are being discussed in the national forum, which are really personal freedoms that the government in a free society should not take away.

Again, freedom does not give a person or a government the right to infringe upon or to curtail the freedom of others. My freedom ends where yours begins, as is often said. It doesn’t mean I can get a gun and shoot someone. It doesn’t mean I can hurt someone with my words, such as being rude, impolite, or insulting. Some
people are offended by swearing, so perhaps in public others should make an
effort not to swear. I remember once seeing a sign along a trail in Hawaii that
warned people against nudity on the beach, so as not to curb the freedom to
enjoy it for those who don’t wish to see naked bodies. If you want the freedom
to go nude on the beach, there are plenty of designated nude beaches!! Too many
people these days think that freedom gives them the right to “express
themselves” by swearing loudly on a bus or wearing pants that show their
underwear, or worse, their butt.  That’s not freedom, that’s just ugly and offensive.

Another very important issue today involving the meaning of freedom is equating “free speech” with money. The more money you have, according to some (including, apparently, 5 members of the Supreme Court), the more freedom of speech you have a right to. I do not believe that the Founding Fathers, when they wrote, “We the people” meant “we the millionaires, billionaires and multinational
corporations”. One could argue that in the 1700s many people were excluded from
the freedoms set out in the Constitution, but we have supposedly evolved as a
nation to include everyone in these freedoms: people of color, Native
Americans, women, gays, poor people, middle class and rich people. Everyone
should have equal access to the freedoms our Constitution guarantees. No one
group has the freedom to restrict the freedom of the others. Read Animal Farm!

There is much polemic today about the meaning of freedom and during this season in which we celebrate our freedoms – life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness – everyone should be mindful of the true meaning of freedom. It is not limitless; nothing ever is.

Rudeness is Brown

Posted by: amoralegria on: July 1, 2011

I reached into my box of prompts and pulled one out. Practice writing
synethsesia today by giving something colorless (hunger, panic, laughter, etc.) color, and describing it.”
OK, here goes.

Rudeness is brown.

I have nothing against the color brown; in fact, I rather like it. Brown
shoes go with everything; brown clothes can be smart and fashionable, brown is
functional. Brown is part of nature, mingling with green in trees and in
gardens. In fact, even this blog is brown!

Rudeness, my pet peeve is brown because I remember a rude person wearing a brown shirt stretched over her overweight frame. It looked terrible on her, which was fitting. When another representative of rudeness once came into my classroom to express her feelings about an email I sent, or when she passed in the hallway and wouldn’t say hello, I have no idea what she was wearing, yet somehow I can picture her wearing a brown top. One that made her look fashionable, yet casual.
Superior.

Rudeness is brown because there are many ugly things that are brown. Brown has many manifestations: reddish brown, dark brown, shirt-color brown, brown turning to black, brown turning to yellow.

Brown mixed with blood.

Brown is a careless mixture of several colors, a failed experiment in mixing colors
to make another, prettier color. Rudeness is a careless choice of words, smeared
over a beautiful person made to feel ugly.

Brown was the color of a lot of the paint spilled in my classroom because it was used to paint buildings: smears of brown on the cabinets, on the floor, in the sink,
on the wall, brown paint that was not cleaned up but instead left to me.

Brown dripping down the side of my desk. A thick brown mass sliding downward,
threatening to reach the bottom, gathering strength as it moves, like thick lava
from a volcano; rudeness gathering negativity as it flows and threatens to
engulf its victim. Lava is red, but it’s also brown, because there is a little
bit of brown in every red, every orange, every yellow. A hint of brown just
under the surface of brightness – a few drops of the wrong color brings it out.
Bright colors tinged with brown, like beautiful things with a subtle hint of something wrong, negative or intimidating.

Fallen leaves, once golden, or flaming red, or mottled green orange and yellow, curl up and die, becoming brown. Those leaves that once held beauty, the promise of happiness, are now discarded, dead, brown. They are scattered with the wind or
gather in clumps, their potential forgotten. Like rudeness: meant to make someone
feel discarded, disregarded, trampled underfoot, crushing egos.

Rake up those leaves and pile them up, like insults. Light a match and watch them
burn.

Shoes: A family story

Posted by: amoralegria on: June 18, 2011

I wrote this story loosely based on a true family story that happened in 1956. It is told from my brother’s point of view.

Allen looked down at his feet as he stood in line for the bathroom at school. He eyed the trailing shoe laces self-consciously as his teacher’s voice echoed in his mind: “Allen, tie your shoes!”

Allen couldn’t tie his shoes.  Although he was already in first grade and six and a half years old, his clumsy, chubby fingers still couldn’t make the series of ties and loops that resulted in a neat bow – or even a lopsided one – like all of his classmates. Well, all except for Gary, but Allen would rather die than compare himself with a dimwit like that!

Even his little sister, at age four, was already learning to tie her shoes, he thought with
embarrassment. She couldn’t really do it right, but she had already mastered
half of it, so by the time she was his age, she’d probably be a pro at it.

Allen shuffledinto the bathroom when it was his turn, trying not to let his shoelaces be seen by the other boys or especially by his teacher. She’d told him once, now she’d
expect him to come out of the bathroom with neatly tied bows on top of his
scuffed brown shoes.  Like he could do magic all of a sudden! He went into a stall and tucked the laces inside his shoes. When he walked out, he could feel them under his socks and it felt just like when he had a pebble in his shoe.

Only now he would have to put up with the discomfort, instead of taking off the shoe and shaking it upside down until the pebble dropped out.

The other problem with tucking the laces inside was that as he walked, they tugged at the side of his shoes where they were laced through the holes, pulling the shoes
open wider and looser, so that as he walked, the shoes gaped open and felt as
though they were two sizes too big.

Once he got home from school each night – after trudging home in his loose, clumsy shoes – he kicked off his shoes so that they tumbled under the bed. He was angry and
frustrated, and took it out on his shoes. Why couldn’t they make shoes without
laces? He hated shoes – hated the sight of them when he kicked them off, and
when he had to pull them out from under the bed in the morning to put them back
on. He liked going around with just socks or even barefoot, but his mother
usually yelled at him to put something on his feet. Now that October had
arrived, it was too cold to go barefoot or sock footed anyway, so he put on his
moccasins.

Allen liked his moccasins – there were laces on the top, neatly tied, but they were fake – they were just there for decoration and you didn’t have to tie them. He wished he
could wear them to school but his mother would never hear of it. She’d probably
say they’d get too dirty.

The autumn wore on and Allen was preoccupied with all the other more important things in a first grader’s life – Halloween, teasing his little sister, doing homework,
cartoons and the Three Stooges on TV, playing football with his friends, and
his model airplanes – so he forgot about his dilemma. His mom tied his shoes in
the morning, often telling him as she did so that he needed to learn how to do
this himself. Once he got to school, he forgot about being ashamed because by
now he was quite used to tucking the shoelaces inside his shoes once they came
untied sometime in mid-morning.

But soon it was Thanksgiving and everybody in the family started talking about Christmas presents. His parents decorated the house for the holidays and he loved to
watch his mom spray fake snow from a spray can through stenciled Christmas
greetings in many languages onto the glass of the front door. When she wasn’t
looking, he couldn’t resist running his finger through the very edge of one of
the stencils to feel the icy smoothness and see the sparkling white on his
finger. Real snow never lasted on his finger when he put up his hand to catch
snowflakes, and he wished he could keep the foamy glitter on his finger for a
whole day. But of course he couldn’t because he had to wash his hands for
dinner, so he enjoyed it for the few moments that he could.

In mid-December, the family went to buy a Christmas tree out in the country. Allen
loved the smell of pine, the sound of needles crunching under his boots, and
the softness of the long-needled firs on his cold cheek as they wandered
through the lot, looking for the perfect tree. Dad would always ask Allen to
help decide which tree to buy. This made him feel very grown-up. His little
sister usually had an opinion, too, but was generally overruled by her older
sisters and himself, because she was too small to make a decision about such
tall objects that were being considered for putting up in their living room and
decorating with tinsel, lights, balls, and a glowing angel on the top. Allen
shifted his weight from one boot to another in excitement, waiting for the
grownups to select the one that they would take home tied onto the top of the
car with string.

On the way home, Allen listened to his sisters talking about all the presents they had
hidden at home and what kind of paper they were going to wrap them in. Even his
little sister had made something for his parents. She didn’t have any money,
but she could draw and she would make little story books for them.

Allen was jealous of this because he couldn’t draw and wanted to give his parents a
present. He thought about the treasures in his room and what he could give up –
he’d found a couple of neat rocks before it snowed. Maybe they’d like one of
those.

Naw – what would his parents do with a rock? Hey, maybe they could make a paperweight out of it! He decided to take out the smooth gray one and use some of his model airplane paint to make a design on it. That would be a good present. Moms and
dads always liked stuff you made, even if it wasn’t very good.

The next day, he pushed a chair in front of his door so no one could come in. He picked some of the colors he wanted to use for painting his rock. He put some newspaper on
the floor of his bedroom and carefully set the rock on it. He started with a
streak of red and loved the bold way it looked on the drab gray rock. Green –
yeah, for Christmas! He tried to paint a Christmas tree, like the one they’d
bought and decorated. It was kind of lopsided, but it looked better when he
added more red and blue for the ornaments, yellow for the lights and white for
the angel. He had some silver too so he added some streaks for the tinsel. The
colors ran together because they were still wet, but he thought it still looked
okay.

Then he pushed the newspaper under his bed with the rock on it to dry. The newspaper scrunched up against something, curled back and the tip of it grazed the top of the rock, smearing the paint. What was under there?

Then Allenremembered – his shoes! Oh, how he hated those shoes! Now they had ruined his painting! Angry, he kicked the end of his bed, stamped his feet and ran out of the room.

In the playroom he saw his little sister watching TV. He went over to the TV and turned the knob to another station. His sister started to wail that she was watching it
first. He didn’t care, he just turned to the Three Stooges and flopped down
onto the couch.

His sister didn’t give up. “AL – LEN!” she screamed. “Not fair!” And she ran from the
room, yelling, “Mo-o-o-mmy!! Allen won’t let me watch TV!!”

Allen hated his sister. What did she know about anything? Her show was stupid, she was stupid.  He hated her, he hated all the four- and five- and six-year-old girls in the
whole world! She had left her dolls on the floor, and he kicked them. Then he
picked up a Barbie doll with a black ponytail and pulled off all her clothes.
Then he swung her around and around by her ponytail so that when he let go, the
doll went flying across the room and made a thump as it hit the closet before
falling on the floor, out of sight behind the box of blocks in the corner.

When his sister came back, she screamed even more when she saw what Allen had done with her dolls. His anger rose as he taunted her and called her the absolutely worst name he could possibly think of: “Poopie-snot-pee girl!” As she wailed and
cried in protest, he laughed and said it over and over as he backed out of the
room.

He didn’t get caught that time. Most of the time he did, but his mom was probably out taking two of his older sisters shopping. The oldest sister was there, but she never
did anything to stop them from fighting until it became so loud that she couldn’t
stand it anymore and came out of her room and yelled at them. This time she
didn’t, and Allen went back into his room, slammed the door and threw himself
onto his bed.

He wished his mom were home right now. He felt like crying because now his present was ruined and he wanted to give his mom and dad something really, really, really special that they would never forget. He wanted to give them the best present they ever got in their whole lives. He thought about his stupid, dumb little sister’s drawings being taped on the refrigerator, and his mom and dad laughing in delight when she read her dumb stories to them. She couldn’t even write – she just scribbled a bunch of
letters that didn’t make sense, drew some pictures, and then “read” her story
to the rest of the family, who thought it was cute. Ugh!

He thought about his painted rock, and how his shoe had been the reason that it got
ruined. Allen leaned over the edge of the bed and peered into the dusty
darkness underneath. There he could see the shadow of his forgotten school
shoes, left undisturbed until school would start again in January, or at least
until he had to wear them to church.

He sighed, remembering why he hated them so much. It was almost Christmas, his seventh birthday was next month, and he still couldn’t tie his shoes. His sister Mary
had tried all kinds of ways to get him to learn – she offered him a reward,
candy even, she tried to patiently teach him, step by step. But nothing worked.
He’d get halfway through, then give up in frustration.

Allen pulled on the end of the lace closest to him. The shoe slid out and the newspaper made a crinkling noise as he pulled the lace upward and the tip of the shoe dragged on
it. He held the shoe up over his head, the laces dangling down onto his face.

Finally, he sat up and started fiddling with the laces. He made letter shapes out of them, an a, then a b, then – easy! – a c. He thought about how he knew his alphabet and how he could read books already. He could count all the way to a thousand, probably, and he could add numbers too! He was pretty smart!

But he couldn’ttie his shoes.

Then he got an idea – the most amazing idea of his whole life! Allen pushed the chair in front of his door again and got to work.

Six days later was Christmas Day. Before 6 a.m., Allen and his little sister were up, anxious to see what Santa had brought them. On this day, they didn’t fight; instead, they both went to their sister Mary’s room to wake her up. Of all their older sisters, she was the kindest to her small siblings.

Soon the three of them, quickly joined by their middle sister, age ten, had climbed halfway up the stairs, standing on tiptoe or jumping up and down to catch a glimpse over the screen their parents always put in front of the living room entrance to
keep them from sneaking in on Christmas morning. They didn’t dare climb any
higher, for fear of waking their parents upstairs, who would not approve of
their “cheating”!

It didn’t matter – the children’s noise woke them up anyway. Instead of being angry,
their mother scolded them light-heartedly, then laughed. What child could
resist such a temptation? Dad swept up the little sister under one arm, Allen
under the other and carried them, squirming and screaming in excitement, down
the stairs. He put them down gently and moved the screen aside.

Immediately, the children rushed into the bright living room, full of surprises and the
promise of happiness. They were joined by Mom, Dad, and the still groggy oldest
sister, who at age fourteen preferred sleep over anything else, even Christmas
morning.

Before long, the children were surrounded with discarded stockings, torn paper and ribbons, abandoned boxes, and piles of new and wondrous wished for toys, games, books, and clothes. Each had a list of gifts dutifully written, to remember who had
given them what. Thank you notes would be expected within a week or two.

Now it was Mom and Dad’s turn to open their gifts. Allen and his sisters sat in wonder, caught between the enticements of their own presents and the mixture of curiosity and
duty of watching their parents open gifts from aunts and uncles, cousins,
grandparents, friends, and of course, themselves. Some of these were really
boring – Mom got a new bathrobe from an aunt or their grandmother, Allen couldn’t
remember which. Both parents got lots of books that were totally uninteresting.
Finally, though, they started opening the presents from their own children.

Now all the children had stopped playing and watched with almost as much excitement as they had felt opening their own gifts. What would Mom and Dad think of their presents? They were all curious to see the looks on their faces and to hear
their heartfelt thank-yous.

The older sisters had all bought something at a store with their allowance or babysitting money. They were past the age of thinking that homemade presents were the best. But the two youngest didn’t have any idea of what to buy for their parents,
even if their sisters were willing to take them to a store. They didn’t understand money and thought a quarter was a lot to spend. Their gifts were always opened last – “Save the best for last,” their parents said.

Allen knew his present was the very best of all. It would be a total surprise, and he had
worked hard, so very hard on it. He could hardly contain his bursting pride as
his mother began opening his box.

The paper slid off his mother’s lap and onto the floor as she lifted the lid of the shoebox Allen had found in the basement. He watched with disappointment as his mother’s smile faded and her look of excitement turned to puzzlement.  She stared for a moment at the contents of the box, while the children stood up to see what she was looking at. Mary smiled and gave Allen a knowing glance and nod.

There in the musty shoebox were Allen’s brown shoes.

The laces were tied.

Post-a-Day: When I’m mad, this is what I do…

Posted by: amoralegria on: June 18, 2011

When I was a kid and got mad at someone – usually my brother – I would either complain to someone (my parents or one of my sisters) or I would retreat into my room and put on some music. Often I would write about it in my diary, which always helped calm me down.

I’m not so different today – I deal with anger usually by trying to remove myself from the situation if possible. If I’m home, I’ll go out for a walk. In the past, I went out to my car, intending to take a drive, with disastrous results: I was so mad that I didn’t concentrate on my driving, and once I backed right into a cement post! Another time, I hit a telephone pole at the end of my driveway! So I don’t get into my car when I’m still at the height of my anger. Taking a walk is safer, and I can breathe fresh air and enjoy nature. This is great in good weather, but I don’t have this option if there is a storm or it’s really cold out. Where I live, this is half the year!

If I’m at work, I will vent to a friend if I can; otherwise, I hold it in until I’m in my car on the way home. In the car, I will tell off the person I’m mad at! I just say exactly what I feel out loud where no one can hear me but myself. Both of these things help to calm me down somewhat, but there are problems with each.

If I vent to someone, I feel guilty for unloading my problems on that person; I often feel as though I lean on a few good friends too much, expecting them to listen to my problems. I apologize every time, but they always say it’s OK (of course – they’re my friends; but it doesn’t necessarily mean that it really is OK). However, talking to a friend helps because usually that person has a different perspective on the situation or at least will provide me some sympathy. I sometimes worry that if I do this too often, that person will no longer want to be my friend. So I try to keep my venting to myself as much as possible.

Telling someone off in my car is good therapy, perhaps; but because there isn’t anyone there to hear me, I sometimes have trouble calming down with no one else to soothe my ego. If I’m really angry because of something unjust that someone has done to me, telling the person off in my mind sometimes gets me even more riled up!

In the end, the best thing is WRITING. I have filled many pages of my journal (just as I did as a kid except now I use a computer) with descriptions of situations that have happened at work or at home that either made me angry or depressed. If I’m at work and simply have to write a rant, I put in a flash drive and save the rant to the flash drive so that there is absolutely no record of it on my workplace computer that someone could possibly find later.

These written rants are probably the most therapeutic means I have to deal with my anger; plus they provide a record that I can look back at later, when I have a calmer perspective on the situation. Sometimes, after reading them, I feel embarrassed about how ridiculous I sounded! But that’s OK – it’s my private journal and that’s what journals are for. These angry writings may provide fodder for a story I’m writing someday; when the character I’ve created gets angry, I have plenty of examples of what that’s like!!

Dog people/cat people

Posted by: amoralegria on: June 16, 2011

Yesterday  I was reading an article from last Sunday’s Daily
Herald
, (Healthy Pets section, June 12, 2011) entitled “Dogs vs cats: Your
choice says a lot about you.” I was interested in this article because I have
long had a theory about men and women and dogs and cats. My theory has to do with
why people prefer a dog or a cat and what that says about their attitudes
toward women.

From  my unscientific observations, it seemed to me that more men liked dogs than
cats. Cat people were much more often women than men. Men who didn’t like cats
said that cats weren’t friendly, they were aloof and even mean. Some men were
even afraid of cats. Men preferred dogs, I thought, because dogs are by nature
loyal and companionable. In the wild, dogs are pack animals and so they are
wired to prefer the company of groups. When domesticated, dogs became faithful
companions because they view the human as being the “alpha” or leader, and most
will easily submit to a human master’s wishes but be happy about it.

This  fits with what a man likes to have in a woman – a loyal companion who is
willing (at least traditionally) to take a subservient role. Even if men today
aren’t overtly sexist, many still seem to have the need to dominate, or at
least to lead. They prefer a woman to be dependent on them, because it
validates them somehow.

More  women like cats than men do (I am not saying that more women like cats than
dogs) because women accept cats for who they are; and women who are cat people
admire the grace and beauty, the independence and perhaps even the aloofness of
cats. Cats can also be affectionate companions, but on their own terms. I think
women who like cats admire these qualities and either aspire or have achieved
them. Blind loyalty is not a desired characteristic – earned loyalty is. Cats
will give you their loyalty if you have shown that you deserve it and have
inspired their confidence. Cats don’t “need” people the way dogs do. Another
reason women may prefer cats to dogs is that cats are less work. Women’s lives
are generally very busy and adding a needy dog to their daily chores may be
highly undesirable.

Therefore,  when a woman meets a man who is a professed cat-person, she should take notice:  this man is worth getting to know – he is not like all the others! Blind
loyalty is not as important to him and what he admires in a pet is more likely
to be what he admires in a woman as well: independence, loyalty that is earned,
grace and beauty.

Of  course, this does not mean that men who are dog-people are all alike and want
to dominate women. In fact, if a man says he prefers dogs it may be because he
doesn’t really know much about cats except what the stereotypes say: they are
aloof and unfriendly. In this case, a cat-owning woman may “convert” a man into
a cat-person or at least one who enjoys both kinds of pets equally for their
unique qualities.

However,  I do believe that a man, unless he is allergic to cats, who absolutely REFUSES  to see the good qualities of cats, is much more likely to be sexist and to want  a woman he can dominate, a woman that is not a “threat” to his masculinity.

I  admit that my “theory” relies on generalizations and stereotypes, and that
modern men are not as sexist as they were in the past. My niece’s husband, for
example, is clearly a dog person, but not sexist – if he were, I don’t think she
would have married him. But perhaps he would be willing to accept a cat as a
pet as well; circumstances (such as her allergies) just do not allow it.

So  when I read this article, I wanted to see if my theory were validated by
scientific research. The article says:

A  team of researchers at the University of Texas, led by psychologist Sam
Gosling, found that those who define themselves as “dog people” are more
extroverted, more agreeable and more conscientious than their feline-loving
counterparts.

Agreeable??  Cat people are not as agreeable? I beg to differ. But I read on…

Self-described  “cat people”, by contrast, are more open, more creative and less traditional  but also more neurotic.

Oh,  well, open and creative, less traditional – OK, now this team of researchers
seems less biased toward dog people. These characteristics do describe me.
Neurotic?? OK, I admit it.

The  article goes on to say that stereotypes  have long pegged dog lovers as more social and interactive with a craving for  adoration – think pack leader – while cat people often are seen as reclusive or  loners with a sensitive streak – think crazy cat lady – but this research is  the first of its kind to offer hard data on the two personality types.

            “Dog people” – based on how people  identified themselves, not on what animals they actually own – tend to be more  outgoing and social, whereas “cat people” are more curious, creative and  philosophical.”

Hmmm,  I’m beginning to like this study!!

Pet  owners seem to agree with this idea, the article says, and that neither one is
better than the other – they are just different. The author quotes Peg
Silloway, who wrote a book called “The Cat Lover’s Book of Days: A Year of Cat
History, Lore and Laughter.” She says that dog people do in fact enjoy the
adoration and unquestioning loyalty of a dog and that people were are always
part of a group (social) have the pack mentality of dogs. Cat people, Silloway
says, enjoy a pet that doesn’t need them but is a loving and loyal companion to
a person who has earned its trust and affection.

Gosling  affirms that there may be significant differences in personality traits between
dog people and cat people, and that these traits make a dog or a cat a more
suitable pet to each. The temperament and needs of the pet play a big part in a
pet lover’s preference.

Dog lovers say: dogs are loyal and affectionate, and don’t need litter boxes.

Cat lovers say: cats are independent, quiet and clean.

Dogs require you be their leader and demand attention, while cats, being lower
maintenance pets, are better for independent people who are always on the go. Kelly
Meister says in her blog “Kelly’s Critter Talk” writes that it is possible that
cat lovers’ relationship with their cat is “uncomplicated” and that cats “seems
willing to take whatever we do offer, in terms of time and energy, without
complaining.”

I  don’t know if I agree with the above statement. Cats get upset if you are gone
too long or if you neglect them, and they show it by soiling your bed, your
carpet, or your couch, instead of their litter box. They may also give you “the
look” when you come home after an extended absence, and run away from you,
unlike their usual greeting when you get home of rubbing themselves against
your leg and purring.

In  Gosling’s study, over 4,500 people were asked whether they were dog people, cat
people, neither or both and were rated on five personality characteristics:
openness, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness and neuroticism.
Neuroticism was defined as “emotional sensitivity and the ability to experience
unpleasant emotions easily.”

Here’s how the percentages in the study broke down:

46%  were dog people

12% were cat people

28% said they were both

15% said they were neither

I would have been interested to know what percentage of each were men or women.

Using a 44-point assessment, the article concludes, dog people scored higher on extroversion, agreeableness and  conscientiousness, and cat people scored higher on openness and neuroticism.

I  do believe that my unscientific and biased theory, based on the findings stated
in this article, does have some merit. And I do agree that I am definitely a
cat person as defined in Gosling’s study. If social means always being part of
a group, that may be something I’ve always aspired to, but the fact is that in
the end, I have fewer friends than such people. It seems to me that “social” people who feel a strong need to always belong to a group are susceptible to getting involved in cliques. I strongly dislike cliques and try to avoid them. Perhaps that is why I seldom find myself a part of a “social group” in spite of a longing to be a part of one.


  • Renay Porell: Great information :)
  • paralaxvu: A few insertions: 2. There would also be paid paternity leave and at least one day off for the death of a pet. 4. Military, police and hunters w
  • amoralegria: Yeah, it's a bummer that funds are being cut for this program, but at least you were able to do it this year!! U of Colo's program sounds fantastic! W
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.